All posts by h79snht.top

تعثر ريال مدريد بالتعادل الإيجابي 1/1 أمام إشبيلية في المباراة التي لعبت في الجولة العاشرة من الدوري الإسباني، على ملعب رامون سانشيز بيزخوان.

شوط المباراة الأول بدأ بهدف لريال مدريد عن طريق فيديريكو فالفيردي، لكن الحكم ألغاه بداعي التسلل على جود بيلينجهام في الدقيقة الرابعة.

الدقيقة 12 سدد راكيتيتش صاروخية ولكن مرت بجانب القائم الأيسر بعد خطأ دفاعي من روديجر.

بعد أقل من 3 دقائق، سجل بيلينجهام هدفًا لكن الحكم كان قد أطلق صافرته بسبب إصابة أوكامبوس بعد تدخل روديجر، في حالة مثيرة للجدل.

طالع أيضًا | لابورتا: لديّ أخبار سيئة لـ ريال مدريد.. وما فعلناه في برشلونة ليس صدفة

توقفت المباراة لعلاج أوكامبوس وسط اعتراض من لاعبي ريال مدريد بأن الحكم لم يحتسب مخالفة على المدافع الألماني، مما أدى لاستمرار اللعب.

كارفاخال أنقذ هدفًا من أمام راكيتيتش بعد تسديدة الأخير، لكن داني أبعدها برأسه من داخل منطقة الـ6 ياردات.

دييجو ألونسو مدرب إشبيلية طالب الجماهير بمواصلة التشجيع، بعدما سيطر ريال مدريد على المباراة، ولكن دون خطورة حقيقية على مرمى الحارس نيلاند.

في الدقيقة 57 أنقذ نيلاند تسديدة رودريجو من مسافة قريبة جدًا من المرمى، قبل أن يدفع أنشيلوتي بـ كامافينجا بدلًا من تشواميني، ومودريتش مكان فيديريكو فالفيردي.

رد ألونسو بتغييراته ليقحم سوسو بدلًا من دودو لوكيباكو في الدقيقة 67.

أولى أهداف المباراة كانت لـ إشبيلية عن طريق دافيد آلابا بالخطأ في مرماه بعد عرضية من أكونيا حوّلها الألماني في مرمى كيبا عند الدقيقة 74.

الرد جاء سريعًا، بعدما حصل كارفاخال على مخالفة من أوكامبوس في الدقيقة 78، نفذها توني كروس وحوّلها داني بالرأس في مرمى نيلاند.

دخل خوسيلو مكان رودريجو، وفي الدقيقة 80 كاد سيرجيو راموس أن يسجل الهدف الثاني في فريقه السابق، ولكن رأسيته الرائعة وجدت تصدي أروع من الحارس كيبا الذي أبعدها إلى ركنية ببراعة.

استمر إشبيلية في المد الهجومي، بعد انطلاقة رائعة من خيسوس نافاس وتمريرة لـ أوكامبوس الذي أطلق صاروخية، اعتلت مرمى كيبا أريزابلاجا.

توترت الأجواء بسبب مشادة بين كامافينجا وفينيسيوس مع لاعبي إشبيلية بعد احتساب الحكم ركة ركنية في الدقيقة 85، بعدما حاول فيني الحصول على الكرة لتنفيذها ولكن مدافعي وحارس أصحاب الأرض ظلوا يبعدون الكرة عن البرازيلي.

تدخل الحكم في الدقيقة 87 بكارت أصفر على سوماري الذي أجهض هجمة مرتدة خطيرة على مرمى إشبيلية.

قبل أن يشير للحكم الرابع بإجراء التغييرات التي دفع بها ألونسو، بدخول رافا مير مكان النصيري، وإيريك لاميلا بدلًا من سو.

كذلك أنشيلوتي دفع بآخر أوراقه بإقحام إبراهيم دياز وفيران جارسيا، بدلًا من فيرلاند ميندي وفينيسيوس جونيور، الذي حصل على كارت أصفر أثناء خروجه.

حكم المباراة احتسب 7 دقائق وقت بدلًا من الضائع، كاد راكيتتش أن يسجل في ثالث الدقائق ولكن رأسية روديجر أبعدها.

إشبيلية حصل على خطأ في مكان خطير على كامافينجا لصالح أوكامبوس في الدقيقة 94.

نفذ المخالفة سوسو ولكن رأسية سيرجيو راموس أخطأت المرمى وذهبت إلى الخارج.

لاميلا أعطى ريال مدريد فرصة أخيرة في الدقيقة 97، بعدما عرقل بيلينجهام خارج منطقة الجزاء، ووقف كروس ودافيد ألابا على التنفيذ، توني سددها ولكن ذهبت بين أحضان الحارس نيلاند.

بهذه النتيجة يصبح رصيد ريال مدريد 25 نقطة في المركز الأول، قبل مواجهة برشلونة في الكلاسيكو الأسبوع المقبل.

بينما إشبيلية بـ 9 نقاط في المركز الثالث عشر، بعدما فشل في تحقيق الفوز على الملكي. أهداف مباراة ريال مدريد وإشبيلية في الدوري الإسباني

A rapid 87 off 62 balls and two wickets from Mukhtar Ahmed set up Pakistan A’s 118-run win against Kenya at the Gaddafi Stadium in Lahore which took their series lead to 4-0 in the five-match series

Umar Farooq19-Dec-2014
ScorecardFile photo: Saeed Ajmal took one wicket on his return to competitive cricket•Associated Press

A rapid 87 off 62 balls and two wickets from Mukhtar Ahmed set up Pakistan A’s 118-run win against Kenya at the Gaddafi Stadium in Lahore which took their series lead to 4-0 in the five-match series.The morning began with dense fog around the stadium leading to a three-hour delay after which Kenya opted to bowl and the match was reduced to 28-overs-a-side from 45. Pakistan openers Iftikhar Ahmed and Mukhtar provided a solid start with a stand of 145 runs. The scoring rate at the end of the 10th over was 6.80, but it was paced up quickly with Kenya conceding 98 runs in next 10 overs.Pakistan A lost two quick wickets during that period as Iftikhar fell soon after completing his fifty, going for a pull only to be caught at midwicket, followed by Umar Siddiq, who fell for a first-ball duck. A stunning running catch by Gurdeep Singh dismissed Mukhtar, who struck 11 fours and two sixes. A late surge from Zohaib Ahmed (25 off 21) Mohammad Rizwan helped the hosts put up a daunting total of 224 for 5.Kenya were shaky in their reply as they lost their first wicket in the first over itself. They never looked strong enough to intimidate the hosts, despite some resistance shown by Morris Ouma (21) and Nelson Odhiambo (22), and never came close to the asking rate. Wickets fell at regular intervals and Kenya were dismissed for 106 runs with a ball to spare.Saeed Ajmal, who has been suspended from bowling in international cricket, played for Pakistan A. He spent three months in remedial work on his illegal action and ended up with two spells of three overs each, conceded 23 runs for one wicket. He was playing his first competitive game in the last four months after he was suspended. He went wicketless in his first spell and struck in his second spell whenEmmanuel Bundi flicked a length ball to be caught at square leg.Ajmal returned with a significant improvement in his action, stride and follow through. His arm looked stiffer and straighter while watching with the naked eye. He wasn’t mixing up the deliveries as he was just bowling his conventional offspin with a slower stride.”I am very happy and feeling comfortable coming back after a long time,” Ajmal said after the match. “I have done a lot and I’m doing whatever I can do to get things right. I worked so hard and gave my 100%, now I am hoping to get myself cleared.”This was my first match after a long time and I have plenty of domestic games ahead of me to eventually regain my confidence, and I will come hard with my same old spirit and flow.”There was no pressure at all playing against Kenya. In fact I never took pressure ever as I am preparing and improving myself for bigger targets like the World Cup, so I am focusing that.”

MatériaMais Notícias

Logo após o fim da partida entre Vasco e São Paulo, neste domingo, em São Januário, uma discussão ganhou força. E Leandro Castan, capitão do time mandante, e Cuca, técnico da equipe visitante, deram versões diferentes para a confusão que teve início no meio do campo.

– Dentro de campo, eu não vou dar bom dia e boa tarde para ninguém. Vou jogar sempre firme. Se tiver que ser chato, vou ser chato. Vou defender meu time, mas nunca desrespeitei ninguém. Depois do jogo, o Cuca acabou xingando a minha mãe. Ele foi tirar satisfação comigo, eu fui tirar satisfação com ele. Fico chateado. Não sei se o juiz me deu amarelo. Acho que o importante é a vitória do Vasco – afirmou o defensor cruz-maltino.

Veja classificação e simulador do Brasileirão clicando aqui

Na entrevista coletiva ainda em São Januário, o técnico do Tricolor Paulista disse que não queria se manifestar sobre “discussão de campo”. Contudo, citou uma partida de 2018, quando era técnico do Santos, e o zagueiro do Vasco teria cobrado Gabriel Barbosa, hoje no Flamengo.

– Eu não ia falar nada porque coisas do campo têm que morrer no campo. Ano passado, o Castan me cobrou para chamar atenção do Gabigol. Ele entendeu. Hoje, quando o juiz apitou uma falta, depois houve um chapéu do Marrony. Isso irrita muito quem está no campo. Eu falei: “Lembra?”. Ele veio com dedo em riste. Coisas do campo. Nada mais do que isso. Entrei para falar. Depois, acho que o Castan queria me falar alguma coisa e veio o pessoal do “deixa disso” – avaliou o treinador.

As declarações pós-jogo de Castan e Cuca foram a poucos metros um do outro, mas sem que eles soubessem o que era dito. Mas são versões consistentemente conflitantes, como o capitão vascaíno deixou claro.

– O Cuca falou algumas coisas que ele pensa sobre mim. Eu o respeito muito como treinador, mas ele não me conhece, não sabe da minha índole. Então, o que ele pensa sobre mim, de verdade, me interessa zero. Quando eu chegar em casa, vou dar um abraço nos meus filhos e, só para deixar claro: quem vier jogar aqui e quem vier jogar contra mim, não vou aliviar para ninguém, dar bom dia ou boa tarde – avisou.

RelacionadasSão PauloCuca lamenta fim de invencibilidade do São Paulo, mas prega cautela: ‘Na derrota, ninguém serve?’São Paulo25/08/2019VascoApós vitória, Luxemburgo destaca: ‘Tiveram uma noção do que é o Vasco’Vasco25/08/2019VascoTalles Magno celebra o primeiro gol no profissional: ‘Como sempre sonhei’Vasco25/08/2019

أعلن تشافي هيرنانديز، المدير الفني لفريق كرة القدم الأول بنادي برشلونة، عن قائمة اللاعبين لمواجهة شاختار، غدًا الأربعاء في بطولة دوري أبطال أوروبا موسم 2023/2024.

برشلونة فاز على أتويرب البلجيكي وبورتو البرتغالي في أول مباراتين، ويحتاج لتخطي شاختار غدًا في إسبانيا من أجل وضع قدم في دور الـ16.

طالع أيضًا.. تشافي: أتفق مع أنشيلوتي وبرشلونة ينظر لمباراة شاختار مثل ريال مدريد

تشافي اختار 20 لاعبًا لخوض مباراة برشلونة وشاختار، في ظل غياب عدد كبير من اللاعبين للإصابة، بالإضافة لـ جافي الذي تم استبعاده للإيقاف، بعدما تعرض للطرد في مباراة بورتو الأخيرة.

وشهدت القائمة تواجد مارك جويو، الذي لفت الأنظار بعدما قاد برشلونة للفوز في المباراة الماضية على أتلتيك بلباو في الدوري الإسباني بمجرد دخوله بديلًا. قائمة برشلونة أمام شاختار في دوري أبطال أوروبا

حراسة المرمى: مارك أندريه تير شتيجن، إيناكي بيني، أستراجالا.

خط الدفاع: جواو كانسيلو، أليخاندرو بالدي، رونالد أراوخو، إيناجو مارتينيز، كريستنسن، ماركوس ألونسو.

وسط الملعب: أورويل روميو، إلكاي جوندوجان، كاسادو، كوبارسي، هيكتور فورت، أليكس جاريدو، فيرمين لوبيز.

الهجوم: فيران توريس، جواو فيليكس، لامين يامال، مارك جويو.

هاجم محمد عبد الجليل، لاعب الأهلي السابق، لجنة التخطيط بالقلعة الحمراء، بسبب التعاقد مع صفقات لم يستفد منها النادي، مُشددًا على ضرورة تقديم استقالتهم لفشلهم في ضم مهاجم قوي للفريق الأول لكرة القدم حتى الآن.

وقال عبد الجليل في تصريحات عبر برنامج “بوكس تو بوكس”، المُذاع على قناة “etc”: “خالد بيبو مدير الكرة بالنادي الأهلي، لا يصدق أنه يتولى هذا المنصب حتى الآن، وهو من أصعب المناصب داخل النادي، سيد عبدالحفيظ كان يتحمل الكثير ويقوم بحل الأزمات بالنيابة عن المدرب السويسري كولر”.

وتابع: “كولر لأول مرة في مسيرته يتوج بـ5 ألقاب، وبالتالي قد يكون حدث تغير كبير في شخصيته، والمدرب اعترف بالفعل للاعبين بأنه سيعمل على تغيير بعض الأمور خلال المرحلة المُقبلة، وحاول قبل لقاء صن داونز تلطيف الأجواء مع اللاعبين”.

طالع أيضًا | نبيل معلول: كولر ليس مسؤلًا عن خروج الأهلي من دوري السوبر الإفريقي.. ويُفسر حالة موديست

وأشار: “هناك لاعبين أجانب تم التعاقد معهم مقابل 200 مليون جنيه رحلوا عن النادي ولم يتم الاستفادة منهم، مثل ميكيسوني وسافيو وأخيرا موديست، هل من تعاقدوا مع هؤلاء اللاعبين لا يفهمون شيئًا؟، هناك علامات استفهام حول هذه الصفقات”.

وشدد: “يجب عرض جميع اللاعبين الذين يطلبهم المدرب على لجنة الكشافين، وتقديم تقرير شامل عنه، ومعرفة مدى فائدته لأي فريق عند التعاقد معه، وهل سيصلح أم لا، ولكن ما يحدث غير ذلك، يتم شراء اللاعبين بالفيديوهات فقط”.

وأردف: “عودة صلاح محسن كان قرار خاطئ، لأنه حصل على فرصته كثيرا في الأهلي ولم يحقق الإضافة، يجب استقالة لجنة التخطيط بعد فشلها في استقدام مهاجم قوي على مدار سنوات بالإضافة لكم كبير من الصفقات الفاشلة”.

واستمر: “كان يجب ابعاد إمام عاشور عن مباراة صن داونز، طالما أن هناك موقف ضد اللاعب، والأهلي كان سيتأهل في حال غيابه، لأن وقتها العدل سوف ينتصر، وحسين الشحات لم يُقدم مستواه المعروف، وفشل في المراوغة أكثر من مرة أمام الفريق الجنوب إفريقي”.

واختتم: “الأهلي عليه ترميم صفوف الفريق بضم ظهير أيسر ومهاجم قوي، يجب الجلوس مع الجهاز الفني وتحديد اختصاصاته فنيا فقط، وترك الصلاحيات الإدارية لـ مدير الكرة يتحرك فيها، وتجديد الدوافع للاعبين”.

MatériaMais Notícias

Em partida de impacto direto na classificação das duas equipes no Brasileirão, o Fortaleza bateu o Goiás por 2 a 0 jogando na Arena Castelão com gols de Quintero e Osvaldo. Resultado esse que causou, inclusive, uma inversão na posição das equipes na tabela onde o Leão se tornou o 12° com 21 pontos e o clube goiano tendo 21 pontos e caindo para a 13ª colocação.

CARA A CARA E SALVA FELIPE ALVES

Somente tendo dois minutos jogados, a habilidade e velocidade de Michael já apareceram de maneira aguda quando o camisa 11 recebeu bom passe para ganhar da marcação e, na cara do gol, bateu para defesa muito importante do goleiro do Fortaleza, Felipe Alves. A arbitragem, de maneira equivocada, marcou impedimento após a conclusão da jogada.

FILME REPETIDO?

Depois de muito tempo ter a bola e não conseguir criar oportunidades que fossem realmente perigosas, em muito esbarrando nos erros de passe e defesa postada de maneira retraída do Esmeraldino, o Tricolor do Pici viu de novo uma bola lançada encontrar espaço para avançar e, dessa vez, foi Kayke que parou em Felipe Alves tentando deslocar o arqueiro. Corretamente, o impedimento foi posteriormente marcado.

CHEGOU E FEZ!

Se estava difícil chegar por baixo, tentando trabalhar a bola com mais consistência tendo a posse, aos 24 minutos uma cobrança de escanteio cobrada de maneira curta foi cruzada pelo lateral-direito Tinga e o zagueiro colombiano Quintero, com absoluta liberdade para decidir o que faria, bateu de primeira para jogar no canto oposto de Tadeu. 1 a 0 Leão.

MUDOU O CENÁRIO

Se antes de sofrer o gol parecia que o Goiás estava mais preciso no confronto, depois desse momento a pressão ofensiva aplicada pelos mandantes deixou em maus lençóis o time visitante que passou a ter seu goleiro acionado com mais constância.

Além disso, aos 36 minutos, a equipe de Ney Franco teve de lidar com a expulsão do lateral Yago Rocha após receber o segundo cartão amarelo em falta sobre Felipe Pires.

RelacionadasMais EsportesDeterminada e sonhadora, atleta do Fortaleza reencontra felicidade no esporteMais Esportes28/08/2019Humor Esportivo‘Entregada’ do Santos contra o Fortaleza rende memesHumor Esportivo26/08/2019GoiásCom propostas da Europa, Jefferson pode deixar o Goiás nos próximos diasGoiás27/08/2019

VOLTOU BEM, MAS…

Mesmo sem ter a bola em todo o momento e também sem fazer alteração de nomes, o Goiás parecia de novo ter arrumado consistência defensiva e até chegou a carimbar o travessão em cobrança de escanteio concluída de cabeça por Kayke e desviada por Wellington Paulista no meio do caminho.

Todavia, aos 13 minutos, bastou uma escapada de Felipe Pires no plano ofensivo para o ataque do Tricolor de Aço ser preciso na conclusão. O camisa 95 abriu espaço na base da velocidade e tocou rasteiro para Osvaldo fazer o segundo tento do Fortaleza.

NA TRAAAAAVE!

De novo explorando a velocidade de Felipe Pires no lado esquerdo da defesa goiana, cinco minutos depois de marcar o segundo gol o marcador poderia ter se tornado ainda mais elástico. Após cruzamento, André Luis bateu forte e viu a bola carimbar a trave esquerda de Felipe Alves que já estava batido no lance.

FICHA TÉCNICA
FORTALEZA 2 X 0 GOIÁS

Estádio: Arena Castelão, Fortaleza (CE)
Data e hora: 01/09/2019 – 16h (horário de Brasília)
Árbitro: Felipe Fernandes de Lima (CBF-MG)
Assistentes: Felipe Alan Costa de Oliveira e Ricardo Junio de Souza (ambos CBF-MG)
Árbitro de vídeo: Rodrigo Guarizo Ferreira do Amaral (CBF-SP)
Cartões amarelos: Yago Rocha, Geovane (GOI); Mariano Vázquez, Quintero, Marlon (FOR)
Cartão vermelho: Yago Rocha (GOI)
Gols: Quintero (24’/1°T), Felipe Pires (13’/2°T)

FORTALEZA:Felipe Alves; Tinga, Quintero, Jackson e Bruno Melo; Felipe, Gabriel Dias (Marlon, aos 20’/2°T) e Mariano Vázquez (Osvaldo, no intervalo); André Luis, Wellington Paulista e Felipe Pires (Edinho, aos 30’/2°T). Técnico: Zé Ricardo.

GOIÁS:Tadeu; Yago Rocha, Fábio Sanchez, Rafael Vaz e Jefferson; Geovane (Gilberto, aos 37’/2°T), Yago Felipe, Marcelo Hermes e Marlone (Leandro Barcia, aos 26’/2°T); Michael e Kayke (Rafael Moura, aos 17’/2°T).Técnico: Ney Franco.

A wrap of the final round of league matches in the Ford Trophy

ESPNcricinfo staff21-Jan-2015Northern Districts qualified for the playoffs after finishing fourth in the league by beating Auckland by two wickets in a low-scoring contest in Mount Maunganui. Graeme Aldridge set up the result, taking 4 for 18 to help dismiss Auckland for 160 in 43.5 overs. They were 65 for 7 in the 18th over before Carl Cachopa made 51 and Tarun Nethula 41 to prop up the innings. Ish Sodhi and Mitchell Santner took two wickets each for Northern Districts.The chase of 161 was going smoothly for Northern Districts, with their openers adding 37, until they lost their first three wickets for five runs. Dean Brownlie and BJ Watling added 52 for the fourth wicket, but there was another slide after that which left Northern Districts on 150 for 8, needing 11 runs to win. Scott Kuggeleijn and Jono Boult got the job done. Matthew Quinn, with 3 for 19, was Auckland’s best bowler.Canterbury’s outside chances of making the playoffs ended after rain washed out their match against Otago in Rangiora. Only 23 overs were bowled after Otago were sent in to bat, and they had reached 109 for 1 when the final rain interruption proved decisive. Aaron Redmond was unbeaten on 54.Bottom-placed Wellington scored a consolation win in their last league match over table toppers Central Districts at Basin Reserve. Wellington made 244 for 7 after winning the toss, with half-centuries from Stephen Murdoch and Tom Blundell. Jamie Gibson provided the acceleration by smacking 42 off 35 balls before he was dismissed off the last ball of the innings. Andrew Mathieson took 3 for 51 for Central Districts.The chase started poorly for Central Districts, with Matt McEwan reducing them to 0 for 2 in the first over. Dane Hutchinson then dismissed Jamie How and McEwan had Will Young caught behind and Central Districts were foundering at 19 for 4 in 6.2 overs. The middle and lower order rallied but it wasn’t enough to prevent defeat by 22 runs. McEwan finished with 4 for 41 for Wellington, while spinner Luke Woodcock conceded only 31 runs and took two wickets in his ten overs.

The Supreme Court’s decision to open the BCCI to judicial scrutiny under Article 226 of the Constitution has implications that go beyond the cricket field and into the boardroom, potentially influencing the way the sport will henceforth be run

Nagraj Gollapudi23-Jan-2015

The Supreme Court’s decision to open the BCCI to judicial scrutiny under Article 226 of the Constitution has implications that go beyond the cricket field and into the boardroom, potentially influencing the way the sport will henceforth be run. That is the consensus opinion among several lawyers ESPNcricinfo spoke to following the court’s judgement on Thursday.While delivering the order, the bench of Justices TS Thakur and FMI Kalifullah began by answering a key question: whether the BCCI is a ‘state’ and, if it is not, whether it is amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. A writ jurisdiction is essentially the right to seek a remedy against the state, the route open to a private citizen questioning a state or state body of any wrongdoing.The first instance of the court trying to determine whether the BCCI was a state and was performing public functions came in a case concerning Zee Telefilms Ltd. and Anr. v Union of India and Ors. (2005). The case related to the exclusive television rights for a four-year period; the BCCI, through an order, cancelled the allotment in favour of Zee Telefilms. A petition was filed by Zee Telefilms under Article 32 in the Supreme Court which the BCCI challenged saying such a plea could only be filed against the state.The majority verdict of the court ruled that BCCI was not a state but it did point out that, by picking an Indian team, controlling the activities of players and others like match officials, scorers, administrators, the BCCI was performing public functions. Any violation made it open to litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the court ruled.On Thursday, the court reinforced the same in its order (Pages 32-35) and further qualified its view as to why the BCCI could not anymore hide under the cover of being a private, autonomous body immune to litigation.”The BCCI can’t make changes on its own which are contrary to the law,” Vidushpat Singhania, a Delhi-based sports lawyer and secretary to the Mudgal Committee, said. “Like in the past the way the BCCI changed its constitution or rules and regulations for the benefit of an X person cannot be done anymore. Earlier the BCCI would say since it was an autonomous body only its public functions could be challenged. But no one could challenge if it made any amendments to its rules and regulations. That is no more the case.”Another lawyer, whose clients include eminent sports personalities, felt the biggest change coming out of the ruling is that the court is now willing to go into micromanagement and deep into the governance structure of a sports body. And that was the area where the court had moved forward from the Zee Telefilms case. “The most significant part is how specific the process has been laid out to determine the punishment. They have named the committee. They have given them specific guidelines. They have made the findings a fact. This is the whole exercise of power under Article 226.”So far what the court used to do was more oversight saying that this hasn’t been done, please go back and do it properly. But constituting and naming the committee is actually a big development,” the lawyer, who requested anonymity, said.According to Gopal Sankaranarayanan, an advocate in the Supreme Court, it is one of the first instances in which the functioning of the BCCI has been scrutinized with reference to the actual cricket. “It is not a question of telecast rights. This is more in the nature of a public interest litigation because it is dealing with lack of transparency, conflict of interests, match-fixing. All these are important issues, (for) all of which even a fan can file a petition.”Sankaranarayanan, who was part of the BCCI legal team in the Zee Telelfilms case, said that the Thursday verdict must put a full stop on the full control the board insisted it had in running the game. “It is not really the law but the courts now feel they are empowered to take on more questions about how BCCI functions. There was this very comfortable couch that the BCCI administrators were sitting on which has been once and for all dislodged. Now they have realised they can’t get away with virtually anything. The courts will step in.”Essentially the Supreme Court has taken custody of cricket as a sport, as a result of which its national administrator will not remain unregulated. The willingness of the courts can be seen in the case relating to K Balaji Iyengar v State of Kerala. Iyengar, a former Kerala junior cricketer, had filed a case of corruption and misappropriation against the Kerala Cricket Association under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988.The special court said it did not hold jurisdiction to hear the case. Hearing the case in 2011, the Supreme Court determined that the KCA was performing public duties and its officials were classified as public servants.It held that “even if Kerala Cricket Association is not an ‘other authority’ and thereby not an instrumentality of the State for the purpose of Article 12 of the Constitution, if the Secretary and President of the Association, who hold those offices are authorised or required to perform any public duty by virtue of holding their offices, they would be public servants as defined under the POCA.”Thakur was one of the two judges who presided over that case. Along with his colleague Justice VS Sirpurkar, Thakur upheld a Kerala High Court decision that said the officials of KCA were public servants. The court’s decision meant that officials who are part of a private body but perform what can be considered a public function could now be tried under the Prevention of Corruption Act, which applies only to public servants.Going forward, according to Sankaranarayanan, one potential scenario where the BCCI or the state associations could now be pulled up would be with team selections. “If a parent of a player feels he has been left out for whatever reasons, he/she could easily file a writ asking for procedures etc. This need not stop only at team issues. It could also be administrative selections.”There is no doubt such challenges will crop up around the country. Whether the court entertains them is another matter. It cannot now decline a plea, but can say it is not a case for it to interfere in and is better left to the experts. “Now the public of India have a right to seek a writ against the BCCI when it comes to administration and running of the sport,” Sankaranarayanan says.Singhania also reckons the BCCI will be amenable under the Right to Information Act jurisdiction. “The court said that you are exercising public functions and that is only because the State has given its concurrence. You are supposed to beregulated by the State. And hence any citizen of India can ask the BCCI for information.”But Sankaranarayanan said he disagrees with Singhania. “The court dealing with a private society cannot change the nature of the society. What they can do is adjudicate jurisdictional powers with reference to the kind of functions that are discharged. The court answered a question in a very, very limited purpose only dealing with whether Article 226 would lie against the BCCI. I don’t think it is such an easy leap to say just because there is a writ jurisdiction the BCCI is amenable to RTI.”The experts point out that the courts do not want to impose themselves as long as the BCCI and its administrators carry out their functions according to the rules. The lawyer, who did not want to be named, points out the court will still never intervene on matters of policy and selection. “It is not just about setting the standards, but actually now quasi-governance. It is almost like court-enforced governance review. To make sure there are no conflict of interests, to check for the various clauses in rules and regulations. The BCCI will now have to guard against any sort of ambiguity, any sort of arbitrariness, [have] much better paperwork and more open decision-making.”

تعرف على حكم مباراة الأهلي وسيراميكا كليوباترا في الدوري المصري الممتاز.

أعلنت لجنة الحكام بالاتحاد المصري لكرة القدم برئاسة البرتغالي فيتور بيريرا، عن طاقم تحكيم مباراة الأهلي وسيراميكا كليوباترا التي تجمع بين الفريقين في الدوري المصري الممتاز.

الأهلي يلاقي سيراميكا كليوباترا في الجولة الثانية المؤجلة من عمر بطولة الدوري المصري، وتقام على ملعب المقاولون العرب. موعد مباراة الأهلي وسيراميكا كليوباترا في الدوري

تقام مباراة الأهلي وسيراميكا كليوباترا، غداً الأربعاء 8 نوفمبر 2023، في تمام الساعة 4 مساءً بتوقيت القاهرة، 5 بتوقيت السعودية.

ويحتل الأهلي المركز السابع في جدول ترتيب الدوري المصري برصيد 9 نقاط من الفوز في 3 مباريات ومؤجل له 3 مواجهات.

على الجانب الآخر، يتواجد فريق سيراميكا كليوباترا في المركز الثالث عشر بترتيب الدوري المصري، برصيد 7 نقاط، من الفوز في مباراتين والتعادل في لقاء وتلقى الخسارة في مواجهتين.

طالع | الأهلي يواجه سيراميكا كليوباترا في مباراة الاقتراب من صدارة الدوري حكم مباراة الأهلي وسيراميكا كليوباترا في الدوري

حكم ساحة: عبد العزيز السيد.

حكم مساعد أول: يوسف البساطي.

حكم مساعد ثاني: هشام الدسوقي.

حكم رابع: إبراهيم محجوب.

حكم فيديو: محمد الحنفي ويعاونه محمد علاء هاشم.

MatériaMais Notícias

Na manhã deste domingo, o Avaí surpreendeu muita gente e, diante do Athletico-PR, na Arena da Baixada, conseguiu uma vitória importante na luta contra o rebaixamento.

RelacionadasAthletico ParanaenseTiago Nunes deixa futuro em aberto no Athletico-PRAthletico Paranaense15/09/2019Futebol InternacionalDavid Beckham insiste em levar Messi para o Inter MiamiFutebol Internacional15/09/2019Futebol InternacionalLampard faz coro por convocação de Abraham para seleção inglesaFutebol Internacional15/09/2019

Na entrevista coletiva, o técnico Alberto Valentim parabenizou seus atletas, que se doaram ao máximo ao longo dos 90 minutos e bateu um rival muito complicado longe de casa.

‘Foi uma entrega muito grande e precisávamos da vitória. Era importante vencermos aqui, pois diminuímos a distância em relação aos concorrentes diretos. Os jogadores foram guerreiros, pois tivemos problemas físicos e seguramos o resultado. Esse time jogou contra o Santos, na semana passada, e foi muito bem. Ainda bem que vencemos’, afirmou.

Com o resultado positivo, o Leão da Ilha chega aos 13 pontos, cinco a menos que o Cruzeiro, primeiro time fora da zona de rebaixamento. Na primeira rodada do segundo turno, o rival é o Atlético-MG, na Ressacada.